Trasylol Sales In U.S. And Canada Suspended Temporarily By Bayer In Early November 2007

Market Withdrawal Or Recall Of Trasylol Seems Possible As Bayer Waits For Final Data From Halted BART Study

(Posted by Tom Lamb at DrugInjuryWatch.com)

On November 5, 2007 the FDA announced and Health Canada announced that sales of Bayer AG’ s anti-bleeding drug Trasylol (aprotinin) would be suspended temporarily in the U.S. and Canada while investigations continued about whether Trayslol is linked to a higher risk of death than competing heart surgery drugs.

As we had reported previously, the FDA has been reviewing the safety of Trasylol since early 2006:

In mid-February 2006 the FDA issued a Public Health Advisory informing doctors and patients that the agency was evaluating the safety of Bayer AG’s heart surgery drug Trasylol (aprotinin injection) after new studies had linked it to higher risks of kidney problems, heart attacks, and strokes.  At the end of February 2006, a "Dear Doctor" letter from Bayer regarding Trasylol was posted on Health Canada’s MedEffect web site.

Later, in September 2006, an FDA advisory panel reviewed data from medical journals that suggested that Trasylol might increase the chance of kidney damage, heart attacks, and strokes.

A second Trayslol advisory panel meeting was scheduled for September 2007.  Two days before, FDA staff released 235 pages of briefing documents they had prepared for that Trasylol advisory panel meeting which seemingly foreshadowed this most recent development in the Trasylol saga.

From a September 10, 2007 Reuters article, "Bayer’s Trasylol may boost death risk: FDA staff", by reporter Kim Dixon:

FDA staff, in briefing documents ahead of Wednesday’s advisory panel, said the totality of three recent studies support the risk of renal failure and dysfunction, and noted a "mortality disadvantage detected" in the Bayer study.

A Bayer spokeswoman said the company looks forward to discussing the drug’s merits at the advisory panel meeting….

"There is still no new clinical data, so the question is whether (Bayer’s) observational study is enough of an alarm," said Ira Loss, an analyst at the investor research firm Washington Analysis.

"My assumption is this drug is being put into the dead-end of drug land," he added.

While the September 2007 Trasylol advisory panel decided this heart surgery drug should remain on the market despite its increased renal and cardiovascular risks, it urged Bayer to conduct a randomly controlled clinical trial on Trayslol.

Bad news for Bayer, however, soon followed when a Canadian study — the BART study, an independent randomized, controlled trial that was being conducted in high-risk cardiac surgery patients — was suddenly stopped in mid-October 2007 due to emerging serious safety concerns regarding Trayslol.

On October 25, 2007 the FDA posted on its web site an "Early Communication about an Ongoing Safety Review Aprotinin Injection (marketed as Trasylol)" which said, in part, stated that the 30-day mortality risk in the Trasylol group of the BART trial was nearing statistical significance, compared with other treatments Trasylol was being tested against.

A November 5, 2007 Reuters article about the suspension of Trayslol sales brings us up-to-date with this information:

  • On [November 5, 2007] Bayer said it had been informed that BART trial data were now being collected from centers throughout Canada and final data analysis would emerge in around eight weeks.
  • "Once the complete BART dataset is available, Bayer will work with health authorities to evaluate whether these data have any impact on the positive benefit-risk assessment for Trasylol," Bayer said [November 5, 2007].
  • "Bayer believes that the totality of the available data continue to support a favorable risk-benefit profile for Trasylol when used according to labeling," the company said.

We will wait to see whether or not the final analysis of this BART study data and any other relevant information leads to Bayer withdrawing Trasylol from the market altogether in the months to come.  Of course, it is possible that based on their findings the FDA or Health Canada may make that choice for the drug company.

4 responses to “Trasylol Sales In U.S. And Canada Suspended Temporarily By Bayer In Early November 2007”

  1. Frank Mazzarella Avatar
    Frank Mazzarella

    I truly hope that the BART study will prove that Trasylol is no longer safe under any circumstances. My mother died earlier this year due to Trasylol. Obviously this needs to be proven, but due to the side effects she suffered after being given the drug, I beieve it is obvious. I certainly hope that Bayer is prepared for legal action as well!!

  2. Tom Lamb Avatar

    I am sorry to hear about your loss.
    We will watch for the BART study results and further developments as regards Trasylol.
    Let me know if you need assistance or guidance with any legal action your family may want to take in connection with your mother’s death.
    Thanks for reading Drug Injury Watch.
    Tom Lamb

  3. melissa creel Avatar
    melissa creel

    My daughter had open heart surgery in December of 1997, then had scoliosis surgery in September of 2000. She stayed on a blood thinner from the open heart because she had a bypass and a valve replacement. Something happened in the scoliosis surgery where the apparatus had to be removed so she basically had 2 9 hour surgeries in 1 day. Something within 12 hours went wrong and she started loosing feeling in her legs, started going non responsive and every time she came back she was worse so it was mini strokes. It was nothing the dr’s did that we could tell because she was at Vanderbilt hospital and they called dr’s all across the country trying to find out what was happening and even in other countries, sending information and no one could find a cause of what was making this happen. There was nothing that stood out as malpractice. She never came off a respirator because she could not breath on her own again, her brain started swelling, she was too week for another surgery, she would not have lived through that to drain the swelling so 2 1/2 weeks later, we had to let her go. She was 13. I have sent for her records to see if she was given that drug. We never could make sense of what happened. She may not have been given this drug at all, but if she did, it would at least make sense. Does it sound like a possibility?
    Thank you for your time
    Melissa

  4. Tom Lamb Avatar

    I am not handling Trasylol cases. An attorney involved in that litigation would be better suited to answer your inquiry about whether there might be any legal compensation claim against Bayer, the drug’s manufacturer, if the records show Trasylol was used during your late daugther’s surgery.
    You should be able to find a Trasylol attorney by means of a Google search. Let me know if you cannot and I’ll assist you.
    Thanks for reading Drug Injury Watch.
    Tom Lamb

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *