Safety of Beovu: A Lingering Issue Which Novartis Attempts to Counter with Recent Study Results

Recent Beovu Label Change in Europe Adds Information About Retinal Vasculitis and Retinal Vascular Occlusion

 

(Posted by Tom Lamb at DrugInjuryWatch.com)

 

In mid-September 2020 Novartis announced the results of a Phase 3 head-to-head study comparing its relatively new eye medicine Beovu to Eylea, a more well-established competing eye drug product from Regeneron. According to Novartis, this study shows that after one year of treatment Beovu matched Eylea in terms of the best-corrected vision acuity for patients with diabetic macular edema.

But what has been pointed out as a bit unusual about this recent Beovu study results announcement by Novartis is an emphasis therein on the safety of Beovu. However, this is understandable in view of a February 2020 notification issued by the American Society of Retina Specialists (ASRS) which raised questions about the safety of Beovu.

Novartis had been counting on Beovu to challenge market-leading Eylea, but the ASRS Beovu alert was a set-back for Novartis. The financial consequence of this concern about the safety of Beovu was explained in an August 2020 Reuters news report as follows:  "[Novartis Chief Executive Vas Narasimhan said in an interview that he] believes safety problems that emerged with new eye medicine Beovu have cost Novartis shares 10% of their value."

__________________________________________________________________

Beovu

Free Case Evaluation

Strictly Confidential, No Obligation.

__________________________________________________________________

 

Returning to the recent announcement about that Phase 3 study, we get the following from this September 14, 2020 Fierce Pharma article, "Novartis, stressing Beovu safety, matches Eylea in head-to-head diabetic macular edema trial":

Normally, late-stage trial announcements center on a drug’s efficacy, but Novartis singled out Beovu’s safety performance in its statement. Beovu demonstrated a safety profile comparable to Eylea’s, including the rate of intraocular inflammation, the company noted.

Close followers of the rivalry between the two anti-VEGF agents know that inclusion refers to a newly noted Beovu side effect that practically derailed the drug’s initial launch in age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

The intraocular inflammation safety signal led to an update to Beovu’s U.S. and [European Union (EU)] labels, which now include information about retinal vasculitis and retinal vascular occlusion, which can cause blindness. To better understand the problem, Novartis has put together a panel of experts from both within and outside the company to examine its root cause, potential risk factors and mitigation measures.

Here is a Novartis press release about the September 2020 European Beovu label change: "European Medicines Agency (EMA) approves safety label update for Novartis Beovu®".

We reported on the FDA's Beovu regulatory action taken this past summer in this article, "Beovu Label Change: Warnings About Possible Permanent Vision-Loss Side Effects Added In June 2020".

We will continue to watch for news related to the safety of Beovu, and report significant developments here.


DrugInjuryLaw.com: Medical & Legal Information About Drug Side Effects
 (All website content by attorney Tom Lamb)

Drug Injury Case Evaluation – Free. Confidential. No Obligation.  (Case review is done by attorney Tom Lamb)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *