Amount Of Epogen And Procrit Given To Patient Tripled Since Early ’90s

Higher Levels Of Popular Anemia Drugs May Increase Risk Of Heart Problems And Death

The most recent discussion about safety issues surrounding the anemia drug epoetin — sold by Amgen as Epogen, sold by Johnson & Johnson (J&J) as Procrit — started with a November 8, 2006 article in the Boston Globe by Christopher Rowland.  He reported on the results of a study that was soon to be published in The New England Journal of Medicine as follows:

[Dr. Ajay Singh, clinical chief of the renal division at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston,] whose clinical trial linked aggressive use of anemia drugs to an increased risk of fatal heart attacks and strokes says the government is not doing enough to protect dialysis patients from the potential dangers.

… The trial, called CHOIR , was halted last year because patients whose red blood cell counts were boosted the most died at an unexpectedly high rate.

… In anticipation of the CHOIR study’s publication, physicians and policy specialists are debating a basic question: How much Epogen is too much? Even though the drug is widely used to manage anemia in all kidney patients — not just the 325,000 on regular dialysis — as well as in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, definitive studies on its effectiveness and safety thresholds have not been performed.

Singh said the FDA should require Amgen and other manufacturers of the drugs — synthetic hormones which stimulate red blood cell production in bone marrow — to sponsor studies to establish a threshold for anemia treatment.

This was followed by a November 16, 2006 article called "Heart Risk Seen in Drug for Anemia", in The New York Times by Alex Berenson, from which we learn:

A medical study to be released today suggests that high doses of a best-selling drug used to treat anemia in dialysis and cancer patients may increase the risk of heart problems and deaths.

… The findings reinforce mounting concerns that kidney patients may be receiving too much epoetin, in part because dialysis clinics make bigger profits for providing larger doses. Studies show that the clinics make little, if any, profit on the actual dialysis services they provide for Medicare patients, who are the vast majority of patients.

The amount of epoetin received by the typical American dialysis patient has nearly tripled since the early 1990s….

But the studies show that the anemia of many patients is being overcorrected and that doctors should aim for lower levels of red blood cells in their patients, he said. The simplest way to do that would be to give patients less epoetin.

Indeed, the solution proposed by Dr. Singh seems sensible and simple enough to implement.  Why, then, is there resistance from Amgen to this solution? 

For that we turn to Merrill Goozner, who spent more than 25 years as a reporter for the Chicago Tribune and other publications.  In a November 20, 2006 email about his online newsletter, This Week in GoozNews, Mr. Goozner gives us some insight.

Nearly a decade ago, I was an economics reporter who stumbled onto the drug industry by attending hearings on Capitol Hill about the fate of Medicare. I eventually wrote a piece for the Chicago Tribune headlined "The Making of a Star Drug," where I documented the games played by Amgen around its best-selling drug Epogen, then as now the drug that Medicare spends more money on than any other. That story eventually became the first chapter of my book, "The $800 Million Pill." Epogen was back in the news last week. A new study appearing in the New England Journal of Medicine pointed what observers like myself have been arguing for years. The high doses of Amgen’s pricey drug may be killing people on dialysis. Naturally, my posts last week focused on this issue. Read them and weep for the poor people on dialysis who have been victimized by this company.

Here are two recent articles by Mr. Goozner about this ongoing problem with epoetin:

Hopefully this renewed discussion about what levels of Epogen and Procrit are safe for use in patients with anemia will produce some results this time around.

(Posted by: Tom Lamb)

3 responses to “Amount Of Epogen And Procrit Given To Patient Tripled Since Early ’90s”

  1. Jeffrey Bowen Avatar
    Jeffrey Bowen

    Hello, I am aware that I am a little late on this discussion, but I thought you might want to know what a dialysis patient with enough education and personal history has to say about the problem with Epogen and its relatives. For a little more than a year I had become increasingly concerned that my blood pressure and heart rate seem to be running too high despite the fact I was taking my bp and heart rate meds according to my doctor’s instructions. A couple of times, one of my RNs called me at home to check on me because I was sent home with a pulse rate between 115 and 120. Usually it would come down shortly after taking my meds after my treatment, but I would usually have to take my metoprolol early to accomplish this goal. Each time I discussed this with one of my nephrologists, he would usually increase or add yet another drug to my already too long list of medications.
    Two months ago, I noticed that it seemed that my pulse rate was once again reaching up to the stars after my dialysis treatment with the only explanation that I might need to go see a cardiologist and to call the doctor if it doesn’t come down after I take my meds. I started taking 50mg of my 150mg daily dose of metoprolol after dialysis and found my pulse rate decreased but not quite to an acceptable level.
    I remembered that approximately a year ago in January or February, I had similar problems with my pulse skyrocketing. The attending nephrologist at the time (several nephrologists who are a part of a group called the Dialysis Associates rotate at my center) prescribed Clonidine at bedtime at the same time I was taking my metoprolol. This helped bring my pulse to an acceptable level. I mentioned this to the attending nephrologist at the “present” time and he refused to put me back on it because he doesn’t like this medication and its potential side affects; none of which I had experienced while taking it earlier in the year. Instead, he put me on Norvasc, which only brought my blood pressure down with little if any affect on my pulse rate. The doctor then added Minoxidil, which brought my blood pressure down even more (too low) with no affect on my pulse, which was still hovering between a somewhat acceptable 92bps to 105 and sometimes higher on non-dialysis days. One day, the head doctor of the group came and my RN sent him to talk to me because she was also concerned about my vital readings as well as my escalating erratic behavior from my frustration with this other doctor with whom I have never gotten along with very well to begin with. I discussed with him the problem I was having with my pulse rate and that nothing seemed to be helping. I also mentioned that I asked to be put back on Clonidine because it seemed to help the last time I had this problem. The doctor agreed and said he would make the suggestion himself to the attending nephrologist. When I got home I located the bottle of remaining Clonidine from when I was on it before and called the dosage information and prescribing doctor’s name so they would know how to renew the prescription, which had not yet expired. Once back on, my pulse rate improved drastically but my blood pressure was going too low. I asked the attending nephrologist to take away or decrease the Norvasc or Minoxidil, but he refused saying my vital readings were going to increase again because he was going to increase my dialysis meds (Epogen and Zemplar) because my hemoglobin was too low (just over 10 g/dl). He had already increased my Epogen twice in the prior two months with the most recent increase just over two weeks. One week after that at the beginning of the following month, a new nephrologist was assigned that was also new to the Dialysis Associates, this doctor seemed nice enough, and I was glad to see him after the problems I had with the previous doctor whom I nearly had barred from my medical record and my healthcare all together. He also, raised my Epogen, which was only just over a week after the other doctor increased it, so this medicine was increased two or three times in a month and a half.
    So I was now being given 6000 units of Epogen. I am a 43-year-old man with a dry weight of 39kg and only 139.7cm tall. I am approximately the size and body weight of an 8 or 9-year-old child. There is another story behind these statistics that would go way beyond the scope of this letter.
    As expected, my pulse rate started reaching around 115 – 120+ bps after my dialysis treatment. After taking 50mg of metoprolol, it would come back down but only to between 95 and 100 bps on non-dialysis days. I remembered what the other nephrologist said about my vitals increasing because he was raising my dialysis meds. The following treatment I stopped the RN before she administered my dialysis meds and told her she was going to have to cut my meds in half or withhold them until I could discuss my suspicions to my doctor that my dialysis meds might be causing more harm to me than its intended benefits. I explained that I think that each time these meds are increased my pulse rate increases and eventually could cause enough damage to my heart to make me ineligible for a transplant. She suggested I see a cardiologist, which I had done last November 2007 and passed the stress test and received a clean bill of health for a transplant.
    Because she did not have the authority to change my dosage, she could only withhold the meds until I could speak to the relevant persons charged with adjusting the dosages according to my dialysis center’s “protocol” guidelines. The RN in charge of the “protocol” came to explain my need for these medications because my hemoglobin was running too low. At the time, my hemoglobin level was 10.9 g/dl. The target goal set by the so-called “protocol” guidelines was a minimum of 11g/dl to a maximum of 13 or 14g/dl. I explained I didn’t think that my hemoglobin was so low at 1/10 below minimum that it should warrant so much Epogen that my pulse rate couldn’t be brought under control. After some debate, I made it clear I made up my mind that I was not going to let them put my life in danger because my hemoglobin is only 1 point below their expectations.
    So, the RN in charge of the center offered to set up a meeting between the attending nephrologist and myself to discuss my concerns and try to come to some agreement how to remedy the situation. Over the weekend of August 23, I decided to do some research on Epogen. With a Google search, I found the latest information on the FDA and Amgen websites that confirmed my suspicions that it might not be necessary for me to receive such high doses of Epogen. I printed off an article from the Boston Globe by Christopher Rowland written in March of 2007 called FDA Warning Drives Doubts On Epogen Drug. I also printed off a package insert, medication guide, and a letter to health care professionals from the Amgen website. All this paperwork had been revised and updated in the early part of August of this year (2008) with the updated black box warning required by the FDA. I highlighted all of the relevant information to support my arguments.
    So now I not only had suspicions, I had confirmation from the FDA that my hemoglobin wasn’t just not low enough to require a large dose of Epogen, but that my hemoglobin might not be too low at all which would indicate that my dialysis center might be overdosing me into potential heart failure. That Monday hoping to see my doctor, I took all of the relevant paperwork and notes I had gathered to make my case with the expectation that at worst, my status on the transplant list might be in jeopardy because I chose to oppose the established guidelines of my dialysis center to save my own life. My thoughts are that I’d rather live twenty or thirty more years on dialysis in relative good health than die in ten years waiting for a kidney. I was born with kidneys that didn’t work and received a transplant in 1980 that lasted 22 good years, so I wasn’t going to let misguided bureaucrats kill me for a little extra cash in their pockets.
    As luck would have it, the head doctor of the Dialysis Associates happened to walk into the center as I was leaving. This doctor is one of my favorite doctors. He always treats me with respect and introduces me to his patients as one of his most knowledgeable patients. The RN in charge suggested we meet then to discuss my problems, so we went to the boardroom to talk about my problems with Epogen. I presented my argument and showed him the information I found on the Internet, and we briefly discussed the CHOIR and CREATE studies. At first, the doctor attempted to make a case that I had always had blood pressure and pulse problems. During my transplant years, I did not need blood pressure or heart medication from 1992 until my kidney failed in 2002. So I explained that I had only started having blood pressure and pulse problems when I started dialysis and that I had been receiving Epogen since I started dialysis in 2002. When he mentioned that I might feel weak and tired all the time, I replied that I am taking so many medications that cause drowsiness that it would be difficult to tell if it is related to low hemoglobin or my medications. Eventually, he confessed that he agreed with me that a hemoglobin level of 10g/dl is not low enough to warrant need for a high dose of Epogen. So we agreed that from then on, my acceptable minimum level would be lowered from 11g/dl to 10g/dl and he had my Epogen lowered from 6000 to 4400 units.
    Since then my hemoglobin has hovered around 10.1g/dl and my blood pressure and heart rate have become more manageable. My heart rate now runs from as low as 77 to a high of 92 on non-dialysis days and before my treatments. My pulse jumps to 102 after dialysis but decreases to 87 to 88 after taking 50mg of Metoprolol. I am a lot less irritable and my energy level does not appear to be negatively affected.
    So, my personal conclusion about Epogen is that I am glad that I have it to prevent the need for a transfusion, but I believe that more patients and/or their representatives or proxies need to be better informed about how this “wonder-drug” affects their heart and vascular systems. I think that nephrologists and dialysis centers should be more careful about how they administer Epogen to their patients. Doctors should be more proactive about providing their patients and/or their representatives or proxies with a full disclosure of this drug’s potential dangers besides its benefits. I believe they should be more conservative especially with patients who have preexisting cardiovascular illnesses, and to prevent or limit the possibility of cardiovascular illnesses in patients who become more susceptible because of their kidney failure.
    In fact the letter from Amgen and J&J to healthcare providers state that by Federal Law,
    those who dispense and administer Epogen and its related medications should provide their patients with the medication guide which is available on Amgen’s website and probably J&J’s website as well. I understand the potential levels of misunderstandings, but I think most patients are smarter than that. I have seen too many patients from my own center die of heart related illnesses, loose limbs, and go through several different accesses each of which had to be revised or cleaned out many times. I understand that I may be the one rare patient that is willing to read the information and make my own conclusion without going into a panic, but I didn’t do all of this research until I began to suspect that Epogen was hurting me or could potentially cause harm to me in the amounts I was receiving.
    Thank you for taking the time to read this. I hope you may be able to use it to help others who may be struggling what to do. My main advice to other patients is to find out what their center’s “protocol” is for their hemoglobin level if they are experiencing uncontrollable pulse rates or if they are having problems with their access or other heart related problems.
    Jeffrey W. Bowen
    September 24, 2008

  2. Tom Lamb Avatar

    Jeffrey:
    Thanks for taking the time to share this detailed account of your Epogen experience with us.
    I am sure there are people who will learn from the information and advice that you have provided.
    I wish you the best in all aspects going forward.
    Tom Lamb

  3. Jeffrey W. Bowen Avatar
    Jeffrey W. Bowen

    I meant to add this info at the end of my previous comment about where one can find the latest information on Epogen and its related medicines. This information was updated last month(August, 2008) according to FDA requirements with the Black Box Warning included in the “Prescription Instructions”
    The following is a list of links one can surf to to learn more about the anemia medicines they may be taking or their caregivers are administering to them. Most dialysis patients, many chemotherapy patients and others who suffer from chronic anemia are given these medications to avoid the need for transfusions. These documents are in PDF format and can be downloaded and printed for personal use or distribution to those who may benefit from this information. I also suggest goggling Epogen, Aranesp, or Procrit to see what others are saying. As with any document downloaded off of the internet or purchased in a library, certain copyright limitations may apply.
    Epogen – PDF documents –
    “Letter to Healthcare Professionals” which includes a notice that the medication guide must be distributed to patients.
    “Epogen Prescribing Information” for healthcare professionals – This includes the FDAs black box warning.
    “Epogen Medication Guide”(to be distributed by healthcare providers to patients receiving these medications – Federal Law required)
    “Epogen Patient Instructions for Use” This is a set of instructions for patients who administer this medicine to themselves.
    http://www.epogen.com/professional/resources/prescribing_information/pi.jsp
    The same documents pertaining to Aranesp can be found at: http://www.aranesp.com/
    The same documents for Procrit can be found at: http://www.procrit.com/procrit/
    This is the same information that is given to your doctors and healthcare providers who dispense or administer this medication.
    Again, thank you for taking time to read my comments. I hope this will help anyone who needs to know this information.
    Jeffrey W. Bowen
    September 25, 2008

Leave a Reply to Tom Lamb Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *