NuvaRing Birth Control Device Can Cause Pulmonary Embolism, Deep Vein Thrombosis, Stroke, And Heart Attack: Part Two

Does Organon's Current NuvaRing Label Have Sufficient Warnings About Risk Of Blood Clots And Related Conditions

(Posted by Tom Lamb at DrugInjuryWatch.com)

____________________________________________________________________

UPDATE:  Our Focus Page on NuvaRing has a complete collection of our articles about this birth control device / method as well as selected news reports about NuvaRing.

_____________________________________________________________________________

In Part One of this series about NuvaRing we looked at some medical information about the so-called "third generation" progestin desogestrel causing a significant increased risk of venous thromboembolism, or serious blood clots; in turn, these blood clots can develop into a pulmonary embolism (PE), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), ischemic stroke (CVA), and myocardial infarction (MI) or heart attack. 

That medical information is relevant to the emerging drug safety concerns about NuvaRing because Organon's contraceptive vaginal ring contains a relatively high dose of a similar progestin, etonogestrel, which is a metabolite of desogestrel.

In this part of our series about NuvaRing we review some of the warnings about a woman's risk of developing blood clots found in the current NuvaRing Physician's Insert — more generally called the package insert, or label — in light of the medical information from The New England Journal of Medicine and the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen which is set forth in Part One.

______________________________________________________________________________

Free NuvaRing Case Evaluation
Strictly Confidential, No Obligation.

______________________________________________________________________________

In their current NuvaRing package insert, or label, Organon seemingly attempts to distance NuvaRing from those safety issues surrounding the third generation combination oral contraceptives (COC) that contain the progestin desogestrel — rather than warn doctors and their patients about the probable increased risk of blood clots associated with its combination contraceptive vaginal ring (CCVR) containing etonogestrel. 

In Organon's current NuvaRing package insert, or label, (accessed 8/28/07 at http://www.nuvaring.com) we find the following text:

Several epidemiology studies indicate that third generation oral contraceptives, including those containing desogestrel (etonogestrel, the progestin in NuvaRing®, is the biologically active metabolite of desogestrel), are associated with a higher risk of venous thromboembolism than certain second generation oral contraceptives. In general, these studies indicate an approximate two-fold increased risk, which corresponds to an additional one to two cases of venous thromboembolism per 10,000 women-years of use. However, data from additional studies have not shown this two-fold increase in risk. It is unknown if NuvaRing® has a different risk of venous thromboembolism than second generation oral contraceptives.

The above text was extracted from the "WARNINGS, 1. THROMBOEMBOLIC DISORDERS AND OTHER VASCULAR PROBLEMS, a. Thromboembolism" section of Organon’s current NuvaRing label and is intended for doctors; this text in the NuvaRing label may or may not be helpful to doctors when they are deciding whether to prescribe Organon's contraceptive ring to their patients.

The following text — taken from the "PATIENT INFORMATION" section of Organon’s current NuvaRing label — does not, however, seem to provide much if any guidance or warning about the risk of developing blood clots to those women who use (or are deciding whether or not to use) NuvaRing:

The hormones in NuvaRing® may cause changes in your blood clotting system which may allow your blood to clot more easily…  The risk of getting blood clots may be greater with the type of progestin in NuvaRing® than with some other progestins in certain low-dose birth control pills. It is unknown if the risk of blood clots is different with NuvaRing® use than with the use of certain birth control pills.

In conclusion — given (1) the current medical information available about how the progestin desogestrel can cause blood clots, possibly leading to death due to a pulmonary embolism, stroke, or heart attack, and (2) knowing that NuvaRing contains a relatively high dose of the progestin etonogestrel, which is a metabolite of desogestrel –- we suggest that the warnings in Organon's current NuvaRing package insert, or label, about a woman's risk of developing blood clots are not sufficient.

6 responses to “NuvaRing Birth Control Device Can Cause Pulmonary Embolism, Deep Vein Thrombosis, Stroke, And Heart Attack: Part Two”

  1. R. HALE Avatar
    R. HALE

    18 YEAROLD DAUGHTER ON DRUG 6 MONTHS.USES MEDICINE DUE TO IRREGULAR MENSTRAL CYCLES AND HEAVY FLOW. sHE WILL NOT TAKE ORALLY & AFRAID OF WEIGHT GAIN. FAMILY NOTICED SHE HAS BECOME VERY ANGRY & ABRUPT. DEFINATLEY NOT HERSELF. SHE FOUND A PIMPLE OR SOMETHING ON HER RIGHT INNER THIGH. HOW DOES A BLOOD CLOT MANIFEST ITSELF ON SOMEONE.

  2. Tom Lamb Avatar

    As I am only an attorney, please understand that I am not in a position to give medical advice.
    I suggest that you and/or your daughter address your concerns to the prescribing doctor or some other physician.
    Thanks for reading Drug Injury Watch.
    Tom Lamb

  3. Laura Avatar
    Laura

    I partly have a comment & partly, a question… I have been on Cerazette which is Desogestrel itself for over 4 years now, having lived in the United Kingdom where it is legal and have to say it changed my life very much for the better after difficult periods and side-effects of estrogen-containing pills. I was disappointed then to find so much objection to Desogestrel here and also non-availablity of my “magic pill”! I have been dreading when my supply runs out and looking for alternatives. I was advised of the possible risks & my blood pressure monitored every 6 months but I don’t smoke & my GP was satisfied after awhile on the pill that it was safe for me to continue as long as I liked. I appreciate the risk to some, but I think depending upon the patient and individual risk factors it could be made available to those willing to try it. Not to downplay risks to those pre-disposed to clots, but there seems a lot of fear here surrounding desogestrel which just does not seem to exist in the UK for whatever reason. My question is, reading this and other articles, could I assume that Etonogestrel, being the active metabolite, will have exactly the same effects on me as Desogestrel? Also, would it be more/less dangerous? Although this post is re. Nuva-Ring, I have found I do not tolerate estrogen supplementation well & am considering Implanon (Etonogestrel-only) instead. Thank you for any advice!

  4. Tom Lamb Avatar

    I appreciate you sharing your experience with the Cerazette (Desogestrel pill) used for birth control in the UK.
    As for Implanon (Etonogestrel implant), it is chemically-similar to the NuvaRing vaginal ring, and they are both from the same drug company, Organon / Schering-Plough.
    We are representing women who used the NuvaRing birth control product and have developed deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), or ischemic stroke.
    As an attorney, I am monitoring the safety profile of Implanon.
    But being only an attorney, and not a medical doctor, I cannot give you medical advice about your possible use of Implanon. Your doctor is the best person to advise you about this birth control choice.
    Thanks for reading Drug Injury Watch.
    Tom Lamb

  5. RLS1231@aol.com Avatar
    RLS1231@aol.com

    I am being recommended to try the NuvaRing due to steep fluctuations in my hormones causing exacerbation of another serious condition (faulty drainage of my pancreas due to congenital defect). My endocrinologist likes the NuvaRing since it avoids first pass through the Liver – meaning it will be less likely to concentrate my bile and cause biliary issues.
    I am concerned about the risks you present here. I noticed you said that the NuvaRing delivers a relatively high dose of the etonogestral and wonder if you can elaborate. I just reviewed the info on Implanon which delivers 60 micrograms a day through the IUD method. I believe the NuvaRing delivers 12 micrograms daily. That seems like a much lower amount of the progestin.
    I am trying to make an informed decision – based on the best information available. I would assume if Etonogestral was a major trigger for thrombotic events we would be seeing lots of these issues in women using Implanon.
    I wonder…why did Organon choose this progestin when there are safer alternatives available? Is there anything good about Etonogestral that makes it superior to Norithendrone or Levenorgestral?
    Thanks so much for your thoughts on this.

  6. Tom Lamb Avatar

    To RLS1231@aol.com:
    I am only an attorney and, as such, am not in a position to give any medical advice. Further, I would not want to interfere with your doctor-patient relationship.
    My blog post, above, was written about two-and-a-half years ago, back in August 2007. Here is the link to another article about the medical aspects of NuvaRing which I posted in December 2007:
    http://www.drug-injury.com/druginjurycom/2007/12/more-reports-of.html
    I suggest that you use a reputable online medical site to do any independent research you may want to conduct about the issues you raised; for example:
    http://www.medstory.com/
    http://healthbase.netbase.com/
    In the end, however, your decision should be based on your discussions with this current doctor or some other doctor who you may turn to for a second opinion.
    I wish the best in all aspects going forward.
    Tom Lamb

Leave a Reply to Laura Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *