When Will Michigan State Senate Vote Whether To Repeal Statute Prohibiting Drug Injury Lawsuits

State Senate Republicans Move In January 2010 To Delay, Again, Any Action Regarding This "FDA Defense" Law

(Posted by Tom Lamb at DrugInjuryWatch.com)

As you may be aware, Michigan is the only state in the country that has a statute, or law, which serves to shield pharmaceutical companies from drug injury lawsuits.

Enacted into law back in 1995, this statute — commonly called the “FDA defense” — states that pharmaceutical manufacturers cannot be sued if their medical products are approved by the FDA, unless the company intentionally withheld information or misled the FDA or misrepresented the product in advertising – which is very difficult to establish.

In more detail, the Michigan statute, MCLS § 600.2946(5), provides that an FDA-approved pharmaceutical product is not defective nor unreasonably dangerous where the product and its labeling were in compliance with FDA requirements at the time when the product was sold. 

In March 2009 the Michigan House of Representatives passed two bills (H.B. 4316 and 4317) that would repeal the statute which essentially gives legal immunity to pharmaceutical manufacturers from products liability legal compensation lawsuits brought by Michigan residents.  If passed by the Michigan state Senate, these two bills would: (1) repeal the statutory immunity provided by MCLS § 600.2946(5); and, (2) make the repeal retroactive so that Michigan residents who were previously prohibited from filing such any drug injury lawsuit could now do so within three years of the date the repeal law goes into effect, i.e., effective date of the statute. 

Now, ten months later, it is still unknown when, if ever, the Michigan Senate will vote on these two March 2009 Michigan House bills that eliminate the "FDA defense" in Michigan.

The most recent word on this continually contentious issue comes from a January 15, 2010 article, "Lawmakers push to end drug firms' immunity — Whitmer, Meadows criticize GOP effort to delay measure", published by the Lansing State Journal.  In that article, reporter Scott Davis sets forth the developments from last week:

Thursday, state Sen. Gretchen Whitmer and Rep. Mark Meadows, both East Lansing Democrats, blasted Senate Republicans for moving this week to delay action this year on a House bill to lift the product liability shield….

On Wednesday, Republicans who control the Senate agreed to a parliamentary move to keep the bill in the Government Operations and Reform Committee and not bring it up for a vote this year. Similar tactics in recent years have stalled a vote on other versions of the bill.

Adam Knott, a spokesman for Drug Immunity Must End, a group that formed to battle the drug shield law, said the group merely wants an up or down vote in the Senate. He hopes voters will pressure Republicans to bring it to the floor for action.

We will continue to monitor the status of this "FDA defense" law in Michigan, and we welcome all points of view on this issue (Note: While Comments are moderated, all are published but for those which go beyond G-rated content.)

______________________________________________________________________________

DrugInjuryLaw.com: Legal Information And News About Prescription Drug Side Effects



































4 responses to “When Will Michigan State Senate Vote Whether To Repeal Statute Prohibiting Drug Injury Lawsuits”

  1. Hank Greenspan Avatar

    Hi Tom,
    Thanks for posting on this issue, which some of us have been working on for many, many years.
    Just a few clarifications. Only the defenders of our law call it the “FDA defense law,” and this was an invention of recent years. People who object to the shield call it Michigan’s “drug industry immunity” law.
    While the law, as written, suggests that proving intentional (which means, felony) fraud might provide an exception to immunity, the reality is that key court cases have generally decided that only the FDA can find fraud against itself, not private plaintiffs. Since the FDA essentially never finds felony fraud in this context (plea bargaining to misdemeanor admissions instead), essentially no cases satisfy Michigan’s criterion.
    And it’s actually more draconian than that. Not only must FDA/DOJ find felony fraud, but the drug has to be withdrawn as a result. (If the warnings were changed, for example, that would not qualify.)
    So, in the end, the so-called “fraud exception” is itself fraudulent. And, indeed, there have been NO cases in the past thirty years–none–which meet its criteria.

  2. Tom Lamb Avatar

    Hank:
    Thanks for the clarification and explanation regarding this “drug industry immunity” law in Michigan.
    I know you have been active on this front for some years, now. Keep up the good work. Hopefully, your effort and time will be rewarded, soon.
    Please let us know about future developments concerning this drug injury legislation in Michigan.
    Tom Lamb

  3. Tom Lamb Avatar

    Hank:
    Thanks for the clarification and the explanation regarding this “drug industry immunity” law in Michigan.
    I know you have been active on this issue for some years, now. Hopefully, your effort and time will be rewarded, soon.
    Please keep us posted on developments going forward.
    Have a good day.
    Tom Lamb

  4. m copper Avatar
    m copper

    who the heck passed this law
    sounds like Michigan people are guinea pigs

Leave a Reply to Hank Greenspan Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *