Fosamax – Femur Fracture Lawsuits Update: California Verdict For Merck In April 2015 With Two More California Trials Scheduled For July 2015 And October 2015

Federal Court Fosamax MDL Reassigned From Judge Pisano To Judge Wolfson While We Wait For Appellate Court To Rule On Appeals From Glynn And Gaynor Case Rulings

 

(Posted by Tom Lamb at DrugInjuryWatch.com)


UPDATE: On March 22, 2017 the Third Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the dismissal by U.S. District Court Joel Pisano of all the pending federal court Fosamax – femur fracture cases nationwide on federal preemption grounds. The Third Circuit significantly held that the ultimate question of whether the FDA would have rejected a Fosamax label change by Merck for the increased risk of femur fractures is a question of fact for the jury, rather than for the court, to decide.

(3/23/17)


 

UPDATE: “Remaining Fosamax Cases Dismissed But Not Dead” (New Jersey Law Journal, 6/23/15)

U.S. District Judge Freda Wolfson of the District of New Jersey has dismissed the last remaining 570 cases in the Fosamax – femur fracture federal court MDL, but the cases could be reinstated if plaintiffs win an appeal currently pending before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

(6/24/15)


 

Since we last reported on the Fosamax – femur fracture litigation there has been a trial verdict in a California state court case and in early April 2015 the jury sided with the defendant drug company Merck, i.e., defense verdict.  This lawsuit was Galper v. Merck, and the trial stated in February 2015.

Unless things have changed recently, the next California state court Fosamax lawsuit trial is scheduled to start in July 2015, with one to follow in October 2015. 

Of course, the results of those California femur fracture trials are much anticipated.

Meanwhile, in the federal court Fosamax MDL pending in the District of New Jersey, there has been a development as regards the presiding judge for that litigation.  On March 10, 2015 Judge Freda Wolfson was appointed to replace Judge Joel Pisano.

Other than that change of presiding judge, the federal court Fosamax lawsuits are in an apparent “holding pattern” while the parties wait for the appellate court to issue rulings on two appeals regarding the Fosamax label, or package insert, information about the femur fracture side effect.

_________________________________

Fosamax / Boniva / Actonel
Free Case Evaluation 
Strictly Confidential, No Obligation.

_________________________________

 

For detailed information concerning this situation we look to Merck’s Form 10-Q SEC filing for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2015 (at pages 20-21 of the PDF):

… on March 26, 2014, [relying upon his earlier ruling in the Glynn v. Merck case] Judge Pisano issued an opinion finding that all claims of the approximately 650 plaintiffs who allegedly suffered injuries prior to September 14, 2010, were preempted and ordered that those cases be dismissed. The majority of those plaintiffs are appealing that ruling to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Furthermore, on June 17, 2014, Judge Pisano granted Merck summary judgment in the Gaynor v. Merck case and found that Merck’s updates in January 2011 to the Fosamax label regarding atypical femur fractures were adequate as a matter of law and that Merck adequately communicated those changes. The plaintiffs in Gaynor have appealed Judge Pisano’s decision to the Third Circuit….

We will be watching for these Fosamax label appeals rulings, which may not be issued until the first part of 2016, unfortunately.

Returning to the Merck SEC filing from April 2015, we get these Fosamax femur fracture lawsuits numbers as of March 31, 2015:

  •  515 cases have been filed in California state court;
  •  1,040 were pending in the Fosamax femur fracture MDL in federal court; and,
  •  3,050 cases have been filed in New Jersey state court.

As for the current status of those New Jersey Fosamax lawsuits, which are consolidated in Middlesex County, it appears that Judge Jessica Mayer is content on waiting for the federal appellate court rulings to be issued.  Perhaps she will surprise us, however, and finally have a long-overdue trial for the Unanski v. Merck case, for example.

 

DrugInjuryLaw.com: Legal Information And News About Prescription Drug Side Effects  (All website content by attorney Tom Lamb)

Drug Injury Case Evaluation – Free & Confidential  (Case review done by attorney Tom Lamb)

8 responses to “Fosamax – Femur Fracture Lawsuits Update: California Verdict For Merck In April 2015 With Two More California Trials Scheduled For July 2015 And October 2015”

  1. paul Avatar
    paul

    hi – are these court actions regarding Fosamax about all forms of Fosamax or just particular delivery types ? eg tablets / pills versus the drip infusion form.
    My mother’s about to start the infusion.
    Thx

  2. Tom Lamb Avatar

    These drug injury lawsuits involve any form of brand name Fosamax — as well as Actonel, Boniva, and Reclast — but NOT the generic equivalent of Fosamax, alendronate, nor the generic version of any other bisphosphonates.
    Of course, any medical questions should be directed to your mother’s doctor.
    Tom Lamb

  3. Colleen G. Avatar
    Colleen G.

    now why isn’t the generic form of Fosamax and the others being considered?

  4. Tom Lamb Avatar

    Thank you for this inquiry.
    The Pliva, Inc., et al. v. Mensing case was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 23, 2011. Justice Clarence Thomas delivered the opinion of the Court, concluding that federal drug regulations applicable to generic drug manufacturers directly conflict with, and thus pre-empt, state law claims.
    The bottom line is that the US Supreme Court ruled in favor of the generic drug company and against the injured patient such that at the present time any “failure to warn” lawsuit involving a generic drug would be dismissed based on this Mensing case ruling.
    Justice Sonia Sotomayor, in her dissent opinion, did well in pointing out the apparent absurdity of this new Supreme Court ruling about generic drug company lawsuits:
    “As a result of today’s decision, whether a consumer harmed by inadequate warnings can obtain relief turns solely on the happenstance of whether her pharmacist filled her prescription with a brand-name or generic drug. The Court gets one thing right: this outcome ‘makes little sense’.”
    It is possible that there could be some federal legislation forthcoming which would “fix” the current situation.
    Unfortunately, I have had to explain this unfair situation to many people who suffered a drug injury involving a generic drug since this ruling by the US Supreme Court in 2011.
    Tom Lamb

  5. angirbaby835@comcast.net Avatar
    angirbaby835@comcast.net

    Now. If my mom was on fadomax from 2005-2008, then the doctor had her on the genetic brand from 2008-2010 until she broke her femur does that means that my mom will not be with these cases that’s pending.or what I’m trying to say does that mean she has no case.
    Sonia bermin

  6. Tom Lamb Avatar

    Thank you for your Comment and inquiry.
    The answer may depend on what year your mother’s femur fracture was diagnosed and in what state did she lived at that time.
    You can provide that information here or contact me directly.
    Tom Lamb

  7. angirbaby835@comcast.net Avatar
    angirbaby835@comcast.net

    Thank you for responding to my email. You asked me it depend on when my mom broke her femure and what state my mom lived. She broke her femure in July 2011, she lived in NY city.
    Thank you
    Angie

  8. Colleen G Avatar
    Colleen G

    Dear Mr. Lamb:
    I need your opinion. As of today, December 1, 2017, it seems that there has been absolutely nothing done on these cases.
    My lawsuit is in California, and nothing is happening. What is going on with the appelate court ruling?? After 6 and 1/2 years, I am getting discouraged, but am not going to give up. Is there going to be a settlement for me and others or not? Why is this such a struggle in getting what is due to us who went thru the agony and pain of the broken femurs,(5/11/2011) and in my case having a second surgery because the first one the bone was not healing properly.

Leave a Reply to Colleen G. Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *