Is Eliquis Safer Than Xarelto And Pradaxa If It Causes Fewer Dangerous Major Bleeding Events

Perhaps, But Neither Eliquis Nor Xarelto Have Any Specific Reversal Agent To Stop An Acute Bleed Once It Starts; Only Pradaxa Does

 

(Posted by Tom Lamb at DrugInjuryWatch.com)

During the American Heart Association 2015 Scientific Sessions in Orlando, the pharmaceutical companies responsible for the relatively new blood thinner medicine Eliquis sought to distinguish their drug from Pradaxa, Xarelto, and Savaysa. All of these medicines are in the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) class of drugs and are competing for market share among a growing patient population.

From this November 9, 2015 news report, “Antithrombotics Have Varied Risk of Causing Major Bleeds”, we get a summary of one such presentation about Eliquis being superior to Xarelto and Pradaxa, both of which were FDA-approved before Eliquis:

Clot-busting drugs work, but they sometimes cause dangerous major bleeding. Reporting at the American Heart Association 2015 Scientific Sessions in Orlando, FL, a team of drug company researchers offered results of a retrospective cohort study showing that apixaban (Eliquis/Bristol-Myers-Squibb/Pfizer) had a lower risk of bleeding….

Compared to warfarin patients, those on [Eliquis (apixaban)] had about half the risk (HR=0.53) of a major bleed. The research is presented in [“Abstract 18465: Real World Comparison of Major Bleeding Risk Among Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients Newly Initiated on Warfarin versus Apixaban 5mg BID, Dabigatran 150 mg BID, or Rivaroxaban 20 mg QD.”]

The findings are contrary to data presented [in “New Global Real-World Data from Atrial Fibrillation Studies Confirm the Safety Profile of XARELTO®”, a press release from Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.] on the safety of [Xarelto (rivaroxaban)] in 39,052 people with NVAF showed the rates and patterns of major bleeding in routine clinical practice were 2.89 per 100 person-years.

The differing research results for Eliquis and Xarelto mentioned in the final two paragraphs, above, mean that Eliquis may or may not cause fewer dangerous major bleeding events than Xarelto.

____________________________________________

Free Case Evaluation (select one)

 Eliquis  —  Savaysa  —  Xarelto

Strictly Confidential, No Obligation.

____________________________________________

 

But when it comes to there being a specific reversal agent to stop an acute bleed once it start, Eliquis and Xarelto (as well as Savaysa) share the dubious distinction of not currently having one that is FDA-approved for use. For more about this unfortunate and unsafe situation, see this recent article, “Still No Approved Reversal Agents Or Antidotes For Eliquis, Savaysa, And Xarelto To Stop Acute Bleeding”, which has this sub-headline:  None Available To Help Patients Who Undergo Emergency Surgery Or When There Is Life-Threatening Uncontrolled Bleeding.

Only Pradaxa has a so-called antidote at the present time. In more detail, On October 16, 2015 the FDA granted accelerated approval to Praxbind (idarucizumab) for use in patients who are taking the anticoagulant Pradaxa (dabigatran) during emergency situations when there is a need to reverse Pradaxa’s blood-thinning effects.

We are currently investigating personal injury and wrongful death cases involving major bleeding events that involve Eliquis, Savaysa, and Xarelto.

 

DrugInjuryLaw.com: Legal & Medical Information About Drug Side Effects  (All website content by attorney Tom Lamb)

Drug Injury Case Evaluation – Free. Confidential. No Obligation.  (Case review done by attorney Tom Lamb)

5 responses to “Is Eliquis Safer Than Xarelto And Pradaxa If It Causes Fewer Dangerous Major Bleeding Events”

  1. D Kane Avatar
    D Kane

    I think that while on Xarelto for 2 years I developed hematoma surrounding my “mastectomised” breast (Implanted) so I switched to eliquis on the opinion of many users who claimed that as of this date thereIs a new antidote. IS this TRUE because I n=may have to have an operation to remove a breast implant that has hardened like a rock showing a deformity and worse hopefully to remove the Hematoma.
    Please email me if this is true.Meanwhile I will continue to do as much research as possible.The above states Pradaxa doea have an antidote
    Please email me of this is true.
    Thank you
    DK
    extrapets@gmail.com

  2. Tom Lamb Avatar

    To the best of my knowledge, as of today (8/9/16) only Pradaxa has an FDA-approved reversal agent, or antidote; it is called Praxbind.
    Tom Lamb

  3. Kate Avatar
    Kate

    For A DVT recently diagnosed in the ER I was given Eliquis. My Primary MD wants to switch me to Xarelto because he can get me a couple of free months meds. Is this safe? Also I do not see any cases listed for Pradaxa – Is it safer than Xarelto or Eliquis?
    How does it compare to Warfarin? Thank You, Kate

  4. Tom Lamb Avatar

    Thank you for your Comment.
    Please understand, however, that because I am not a physician but only an attorney I am not in a position to give any medical opinion as regards your situation.
    I will point out that at the current time Pradaxa has an FDA-approved reversal agent, Praxbind. At the current time there is no FDA-approved reversal agent for Xarelto, Eliquis, or Savaysa.
    Warfarin has long had an “antidote”.
    I wish you the best in all aspects going forward.
    Have a good weekend.
    Tom Lamb

  5. Josy Avatar
    Josy

    Good day. What does it mean when we read and research that Pradax could cause more internal bleeding? Sorry if my question is not clear and thank you for your reply. Would this mean that taking this medication the risk to internal bleeding is higher than If taking Eliquise ? Thank you

Leave a Reply to D Kane Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *